SNAP Heartworm RT Test

SNAP Heartworm RT Test

Proven sensitivity for even low worm-burden infections1

Annual heartworm testing is an integral part of achieving effective prevention, as recommended by the American Heartworm Society and the Companion Animal Parasite Council.

SNAP tests provide reference laboratory quality technology for superior diagnostic accuracy at the point of care.

Automatically activate SNAP tests to save time and improve work flow with the SNAP Pro Analyser.

Order now


Screen and detect heartworm infection even in patients with low heartworm burden


Heartworm disease has been found in dogs in all 50 of the United States. While heartworm is both treatable and preventable, it is a serious and deadly disease that may show no clinical signs in its early stage. Screen annually to find even low worm-burden patients sooner and more often, and begin treatment when you can do the most good.


One SNAP can change everything

Watch how SNAP technology delivers superior diagnostic accuracy – and see what you may sacrifice when you use a test without it.


Related products

Get the most out of your SNAP Heartworm RT Test

View and trend all your results

Get a more complete picture of your patient’s health with .

SNAP Pro Analyzer

Automate your work flow

Reduce the chance for human error and integrate your SNAP results with the .

Gain further insight

Confirm any positive results with another antigen test and microfilaria test from IDEXX Reference Laboratories as recommended by American Heartworm Society (AHS) guidelines.


We’re here to help you 24 hours a day, seven days a week

Customer Service: 1300 44 33 99

Test insert & resources

Access the SNAP Heartworm RT Test product insert, accuracy data, sample preparation, results interpretation information and more.

i-Dx Ordering

Learn more about ordering directly from IDEXX and order your in-house tests and supplies today.


  1. Atkins CE. Comparison of results of three commercial heartworm antigen test kits in dogs with low heartworm burdens. JAVMA. 2003;222(9):1221-1223.